Category Archives: Political Corner

Margaret Thatcher, Feminist Icon?


Posted on April 9, 2013 by

PA Photos /Landov; via NPR.

PA Photos /Landov; via NPR.

I lived for several years in Great Britain and at one time or another, I had a conversation with several British-born friends about Margaret Thatcher. If you haven’t been keeping up with the news, the first female prime minister of the United Kingdom (and first elected female leader of a G-8 western power), Margaret Thatcher died yesterday.

Thatcher is the ultimate divisive feminist icon: she shattered the glass ceiling for women around the world, but she quite avidly did not believe in feminism herself. However, she first ran for a seat in the House of Commons in 1951, before she was married (and still Margaret Roberts) – a mindblowing undertaking in retrospect. Yet her political principles, by and large, were not in line with feminist ones. Many American conservatives herald her as a icon; many Britons and Europeans were glad to see notices of her death. Margaret Thatcher was a polarizing icon, to say the least.

So, Feronians, what do you think? Is Margaret Thatcher is a feminist icon? Should she be?

Florida & Medicaid Expansion: The Latest News


Posted on April 3, 2013 by

Found at the Texas Tribune.

Found at the Texas Tribune.

Have you heard of the Negron Plan? Well, it might be Florida’s way of expanding Medicaid and still getting the federal matching dollars (without really expanding Medicaid).

After Florida’s House of Representatives voted down the expansion of Medicaid, lawmakers then began looking for alternatives. The Negron Plan “[c]reates a new state-based health insurance program for the uninsured. Appears to comply with the federal health care law, making Florida eligible to receive associated funding,” according to this great article from the Miami Herald. It would also be targeted at those that general Medicaid expansion would also target: those making 138% or less of the national poverty level – approximately 1 million people in the state of Florida.

There’s another alternative popping up in Florida: the Bean Plan. (Both are named after the congressional members who introduced them.) The Bean plan would give people making 100% of the poverty line or below $10 a month to defray costs of purchasing state-subsidized health care. This would help around 600,000 people, but let’s be honest: it won’t help them much.

Another major difference between the two? The Negron Plan qualifies for matching federal dollars (all $55 billion of them); the Bean Plan does not. (For a great rundown, this Miami Herald article does a fantastic job of breaking the two down and comparing them.)

That’s the latest on Florida and Medicaid – you know we will be keeping you updated; it matters to us, it matters to Floridians, and it should matter to the legislature. We’ll see.

Human Rights Campaign Turns Red


Posted on March 27, 2013 by

blueI don’t know about all of you but my Facebook feed turned red yesterday. I couldn’t be prouder! The Human Rights Campain, who’s usual icon is this blue/yellow equal sign, encouraged their Facebook followers to show their support for LGBT equal rights by turning their Facebook photo to this red/pink one. redIn case you haven’t heard, the Supreme Court is hearing two cases this week: California’s Proposition 8 and The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). In short, both cases deny non-heterosexual couples the right to marry. Many activists see gay rights as the civil rights issue of our time and many people and organizations are weighing in – President Obama, Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Republican Senator Rob Portman, and pretty much the rest of America.

Our nation’s highest court is working to determine whether Prop 8 and DOMA are unconstitutional. Slavery? Unconstitutional. Denying women the right to vote? Unconstitutional. Banning gay marriage? Unconstitutional. Here’s the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in case 8th grade Social Studies is a little fuzzy for you. The Feronia Project is on the right side of history. Are you?

constitution_1_of_4_630

 

The State of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid Expansion in Florida


Posted on March 20, 2013 by

florida_ref_2001The Feronia Project is a project of Planned Parenthood of Southwest & Central Florida, so today, I wanted to talk about what is most pressing for us: the state of the Affordable Care Act in Florida.

Florida is infamous for many things (I say as a proud Floridian) but one of the most recent ones was our Tea Party Republican governor, Rick Scott, coming out recently for the expansion of Medicaid. (The expansion of Medicaid is one of the most important decisions that a state will have to make when it comes to the ACA; it is a decision that came out of the Supreme Court decision last June.) Medicaid is a program for the poorest of the poor to get healthcare, but states decide who is poor enough to qualify for it. In Florida, by the way? You have to make less than $2,000 to qualify and that’s for a family with children. Single men absolutely cannot qualify for Medicaid at all.

100% of the cost of Medicaid expansion will be covered by the federal government for the first year, decreasing to 90% in ten years. And that’s all – the federal government will continue to cover 90% of the cost of expansion in perpetuity. Florida politicians have said recently, however, that they doubt the federal government is “good for it” – i.e., the federal government will pull their support when the next monetary crisis hits.

Regardless of how you feel about that pronouncement, it’s been what Florida politicians have been using to justify their opposition to expanding Medicaid. Will Weatherford, Florida’s current speaker of the house, has come out against Medicaid (while either ignoring or genuinely not knowing that the program assisted his family when his brother fought and unfortunately lost his battle with childhood cancer) and the House voted the Medicaid expansion down; the Florida Senate has all but done the same, saying that it’s rather useless to vote on it if the House doesn’t approve.

Whether or not it’s useless is debatable as the House and Senate’s decision leaves more than 1 million uninsured Floridians without access to affordable health care – 57% more Floridians would have health care coverage. I don’t know about you, but to me? That’s no small number.

We at Planned Parenthood of Southwest & Central Florida believe that we should take care of our Floridians – and save money while doing it. The expansion of Medicaid would do just that.

Do you support it? Follow Florida CHAIN on Facebook and let our legislators know – everyone deserves access to affordable, quality, and low-cost healthcare.

The Affordable Care Act: The Health Insurance Marketplace


Posted on March 19, 2013 by

Even though the Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010, it has been rolling out slowly to allow employers, consumers, insurance companies, and health care providers time to prepare. One aspect of the ACA that you may not have heard about yet is The Health Insurance Marketplace (effective October 1, 2013 with coverage beginning January 1, 2014). From the healthcare.gov website:

When key parts of the health care law take effect in 2014, there’ll be a new way to get health insurance: the Health Insurance Marketplace. The Marketplace is designed to help you find health insurance that fits your budget, with less hassle. Every health insurance plan in the new Marketplace will offer comprehensive coverage, from doctors to medications to hospital visits. You can compare all your insurance options based on price, benefits, quality, and other features that may be important to you, in plain language that makes sense. You’ll know you’re getting a quality health plan at a reasonable price, because there’s nothing buried in the fine print.

 

Watch this video to learn how it works:

Every state will have a Health Insurance Marketplace, but each state can choose how it will operate. States can create and run their own Marketplace, or have a Marketplace supported by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). States may also choose to partner with HHS to run some functions of their Marketplace. Check back to the healthcare.gov website often to see what your state chooses to do. Even members of Congress will be using the Health Insurance Marketplace!

If you are currently enrolled in a health insurance program, you’ve probably seen your Summary of Benefits/Coverage (SBC). You probably only look at it when you have a big health care cost coming up or at your company’s annual enrollment time. Now, SBCs are supposed to be uniform in  their appearance in order to make comparison shopping easier. See sample here. Seriously, go take a look at it. It was modeled after the Nutrition Facts labels you find on food products (look at page 7). When you go into the Marketplace to choose your insurance, you’ll be looking at these SBCs and selecting the one that best fits you.

If you haven’t spent time reading the actual law and what it means, go do it!

The ACA (Affordable Care Act): How Does It Impact You?


Posted on March 18, 2013 by

This week, we’re talking about the Affordable Care Act and what better place to start than with how it began? Our great intern here at the Feronia Project put together this assessment of the Affordable Care Act.

2012-0710-nam-california-wins-with-affordable-care-act-decision-580x327On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA). If implemented properly, the plan’s focus on short-term health insurance access and preventative care will lead to long-term public health benefits. The controversy surrounding the ACA, and the several-year period in which it is being implemented has caused confusion about what the act provides.

Below is a quick summary of how the ACA could affect you:

  • All insurance companies are now required to submit clear summaries of their plans in a format based on the nutrition fact label. This simplification will allow consumers to more easily compare the benefits of insurance plans without the confusing jargon and vague descriptions of coverage. In some states, Consumer Assistance Programs (CAPs) have been created to help Americans file complaints and appeals to their insurance company, enroll in new policies, and learn about their health insurance rights (Check if your state has implemented this yet; Floridians, our CAP is still being developed.)
  • Insurance policies created on or after September 23, 2010 have to fully cover 14 vital preventative services for women, including yearly mammograms for women over 40, and screenings for cervical cancer, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis. Other covered services for all adults are tests for blood pressure, diabetes and cholesterol, many cancer screenings, routine vaccinations, and counseling for quitting smoking, losing weight, treating depression, and reducing alcohol use. For pregnant women, policies must cover counseling, screening, and vaccines, as well all regular “well-baby” and “well-child” visits after the child is born, until age 21. A full list of all covered preventative services is available here.
  • And if your health insurance policy was established on or after August 1, 2012? You’ve got twenty-two potentially life-saving preventative services for women that should be covered, including eight new preventative services, covered without co-pay:

1. Breastfeeding support and access to supplies
2. Contraception and sterilization procedures
3. Domestic/interpersonal violence screening and counseling
4. Gestational diabetes screening for pregnant women
5. HIV screening
6. HPV screening (for high risk women)
7. STI counseling for sexually active women
8. “Well-woman” visits in order to receive recommended preventative services
     So, will all or some of these benefits apply to you?

If your insurance policy is “grandfathered in” (a health plan that already existed on March 23, 2010 when the ACA was signed), many of the preventative services will not yet be covered. Policies distributed through a network provider may also not yet cover these services. Doctor office visits that are not primarily for preventative services may not be covered under any policy, new or old.

However, even if your plan has been “grandfathered in,” you still have some new benefits. Insurance companies are prevented from applying “lifetime dollar limits” to your plan (i.e., they cannot stop covering you after you use a certain amount of insurance); they are not allowed to cancel plans because of simple application mistakes; and dependent coverage has been extended to children under 26. Job-based and grandfathered plans are still not required to cover preventative care, new protection on appeals, and provide choice of health care or emergency care providers, though.

Insurance companies are no longer allowed to charge more based on gender; for women, this costs approximately $1 billion a year on the current insurance market, according to the National Women’s Law Center. This protection will make a huge difference for women who are being discriminated against because of their reproductive processes. Also, insurance plans now have to include all Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, including sterilization, and necessary counseling. Individuals who are eligible for Medicaid beginning in 2014 should see an increase in coverage, making healthcare more accessible for every woman. (We’ll be talking more about this during the week.)

The Patient’s Bill of Rights, which explains your new insurance rights, is available here. The Bill (which applies to policies established on or after March 23, 2010) guarantees your right to appeal, explains no-cost preventative care services, provides coverage to adults and children with pre-existing conditions, allows you to choose any doctor from your insurance network, and removes the need for a referral for ob-gyn services.

In addition to extending coverage, the ACA creates new insurance plan options: pre-existing condition coverage, young adult coverage, and starting in 2014, a state-based health insurance marketplace and co-op insurance plans for small businesses. Also coming in 2014 are tax credits for middle class families.

Sounds good, right? Well, not everybody thinks so. We’re going to be talking about the act – why it’s disputed and the state of your state – all week.

Arkansans Deserve Better: Planned Parenthood Condemns Most Extreme Abortion Ban in U.S.


Posted on March 13, 2013 by

181016_471474056240797_555277792_nI love Arkansas. I’ve been a tourist to the fine state, dug in their diamond mine, and talked it up to all of my friends. I maintain that the state of Arkansas is an oft-overlooked gem.

However, the fact is that Arkansans deserve better than what their legislature did last week: the Arkansas legislature passed the most extreme abortion ban in the United States – twice – over their governor’s veto. Arkansas’ 12-week ban on abortions signals that 2013 may be even worse than the record-breaking years of 2011 and 2012 for state legislation that limits access to women’s health care.

People in Arkansas and across America know that abortion is a deeply personal and often complex decision for a woman to make. In fact, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll released in January 2013 found that a majority of Americans – 70 percent – oppose efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade, the highest percentage on this question in nearly 30 years.

The most egregious part of this legislation? Federal courts have again and again declared it unconstitutional: Idaho’s 20-week abortion ban was just declared unconstitutional the day after the Arkansas legislation was passed. Voters and courts have opposed legislation like this time and time again: it’s time for state legislatures to listen.

This trend is a disturbing one, but you can be assured that Planned Parenthood will be there in all 50 states to ensure women have access to reproductive health care, no matter what.

VAWA: We’ve Passed It, But Now What?


Posted on March 6, 2013 by

(Editor’s Note: We are thrilled to have a great public policy student interning with us this semester. This is the first of her posts, but you’ll see more soon!)

Image found here.

Image found here.

Last Thursday, Congress voted to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in a bi-partisan vote of 286-138. YES! VAWA now provides protection for immigrant and Native American women, as well as the LGBT community. It will also increase funding for non-profits assisting survivors of sexual assault as well.

The prevention of domestic violence and assault against women has recently become a global movement with the One Billion Rising event that occurred on Valentine’s Day last month, all over the world. Although One Billion Rising only addressed violence against women, it was a powerful statement that the world is not willing to accept this violence any longer. (Watch all the videos at http://www.onebillionrising.org/livestream).

The national and international media coverage on sexual assault recently has developed the movement to protect women, whether in the streets of India, or on tribal lands in the U.S. As this movement grows, its power needs to be harnessed to protect all survivors of intimate partner violence and sexual assault. The reauthorization of VAWA is a great victory, and has increased the possibilities of legal recourse and prevention of discrimination, but wait, what next?

VAWA’s exclusion of men and boys who suffer from domestic violence and sexual assault is troubling. Although the majority of domestic violence occurs against women, it is important to recognize that violence and sexual assault it not limited by sexual orientation or gender identity. It can literally happen to anyone. Another shortcoming of VAWA is that the term LGBT is used instead of LGBTQ, which will continue to exclude Americans who identify as queer.

Future legislation needs to include all survivors of intimate partner violence and sexual assault. As Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi, stated, “Let’s… ensure that no woman is ever forced to suffer in silence in the face of domestic violence and abuse.” We have an opportunity to ensure this internationally as well. As John Kerry, newly-appointed Secretary of State, comes into office, it is essential that he continues to integrate women’s health programs into U.S. foreign policy and we’ll be here to remind him of that, no matter what.

Heard About the Brouhaha in North Dakota?


Posted on February 5, 2013 by

North DakotaI have a special spot in my heart for North Dakota – you work on a campaign there in the middle of a boiling hot Fargo summer, you become fond of it. (And I can pretty much beat anyone here in Florida on ‘most remote state you’ve been to.’) So, I keep up with North Dakota news.

Have you heard the recent story in the news about North Dakota? The university president of North Dakota State University has decided to not accept grant money ($1.2 million over three years) that would assist in preventing teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases in youths in foster care because the program would be run by Planned Parenthood of North Dakota and the statistics would be analyzed by the professors.

Needless to say, this has been a polarizing issue in the state and among the faculty and students of North Dakota State University. (Planned Parenthood of North Dakota, by the way, does not perform abortions in the state.) We are a little biased, of course, but we think that the university president made the wrong choice – and the attorney general of the state is looking into the issue as well.

What do you think? Is the president of NDSU wrong or right in refusing the money?

Links We Love: Tuesday Edition


Posted on January 29, 2013 by

woman_reading_newspaperHappy Tuesday, Feronians! Hopefully, it’ll be even better than your Monday.

Today, we’re sharing some awesome stories we’ve found on the internets:

And lastly, but never least: is a Disney-and-princess-free daughter a more empowered one? It’s a very good question.

Have you seen anything interesting in the news lately that you’d like to share?