Tag Archives: body image

Ode to Joy Nash’s ‘Fat Rant’


Posted on August 21, 2012 by

Joy Nash's 'Fat Rant'As I’ve mentioned previously on the Feronia Project, I used to be very overweight, or as actress and body rights activist Joy Nash calls it, “moderately obese.” This began from infancy, and the pounds continued to mount until I found myself at the age of 24 standing 5’4″ and weighing 218lbs. I felt ashamed, humiliated, and invisible to my culture and those around me. I grew up consuming teen magazines and watching MTV just like my peers did, and always felt sick and sad that overweight women were not portrayed in the media in any sort of positive light. We were only the ass of jokes or the example of what not to “let yourself become.”

In a time of loneliness, isolation and depression related to the scrutiny of my body issues, I came across a video on Myspace (remember when that was THE PLACE on the web?) that absolutely empowered me and lit me up inside. It was called “Fat Rant,” a short declaration of independence for fat women like me to stop self-hating and seize life!

I eventually did lose 70lbs through maintaining an online food diary and exercising, and have managed to keep it off for a year and a half. As Joy points out in her video, 95-98% of people who lose 75lbs or more gain it all back within the first three years, two-thirds of those within the first year. So I realize my work is still ahead of me as I maintain a different and more active lifestyle than before, and take my health one day at a time.

But to you, Feronia readers, you likely have had body issues at one time or another – it’s hard to escape the forcefed images of the Photoshopped thin ideal (harassing you in the check-out line magazine racks, internet advertisements, and ANY television show). I encourage you to check out Joy’s “Fat Rant” – I hope it will make you feel a little more entitled to relaxing in your own skin, no matter what size your clothes are.

Body Hair: What’s All the Fuss About?


Posted on June 4, 2012 by

Today’s guest post is from “Erin” who is a graduating student of Women’s and Gender Studies at a local university. She specializes in sexuality as it relates to gender and her main focus is reproductive rights history.

Body hair is an interesting phenomenon. Women are supposed to be free of any hair and men can have as much as they like, right? Wrong. Like other gender binary differences, body hair practices are culturally learned behaviors.

The norms of a hairless beauty ideal have changed over time and between cultures. According to “The Hairless Ideal: Women and Their Body Hair” by Susan A. Basow from the Psychology of Women Quarterly Journal, women did not start removing body hair until about 1915. Before this time the clothing styles did not publicly reveal legs or underarms, so hair removal wasn’t necessary. Around 1915 we started seeing advertisements targeting women to shave their underarms. The ads tended to be instructional and tried to persuade women to purchase the hair removal product, usually a razor, because hair not growing on the head was viewed as “superfluous,” “unwanted,” “ugly” and “unfashionable.”

This is a classic example of the media and advertising industries targeting women’s insecurities, or rather creating insecurities for women to have, in order to sell their products. We see this in modern advertising campaigns all the time. Jean Kilbourne does an awesome job of illustrating the dangers of advertising on women in her documentary Killing Us Softly 4.

The wording used in the ads for razors in the 1910s was very deliberate. While men “shaved,” women “smoothed.” Presenting women as delicate and fragile, while presenting men as burly and strong. Now, it is an important side note that these ads only targeted white women as the ideal beauty. Racism was alive and well and continues to be. Just check out this post about a modern ad and colorism.

As we move into the 1940s, advertisers started to target women’s leg hair for removal. This comes from changing styles of clothing that begin to show more of the leg. Also, before this time, even saying the word “leg” was pretty risqué. This time also coincided with nylon shortages due to WWII. All these factors contributed to the rise in a hairless leg ideal.

All this is to say that it is important to recognize the history of where our cultural practices come from. Body hair removal stems from an industry that aims to make a profit from the insecurities of women. There is a double standard between men and women, which brings this topic into the realm of sexism. The double standard is that men are encouraged to present hairier bodies, while women are socially punished for the same. On a more personal level, if you decide to shave your body hair because it makes you feel better, by all means do so. Just keep in mind why you are doing it. I personally decided to forgo body hair removal because I wanted to rebel against the traditional notions of beauty in our culture. And, quite frankly, it has been liberating! I am more confident about my body image than ever before in my life. Now, I still reach for the razor in my morning routine out of habit until I realize that I decided to stop. Old habits die hard, I guess.

This all goes for pubic hair, too. For more on that check out last week’s post To Shave or Not To Shave for tips on how to shave down there if you decide that’s your thing.

 

Media, Surgery, and Body Image: Loving Your Vulva Isn’t Easy Nowadays


Posted on May 21, 2012 by

Disclaimer: Most of the links in this article link to images or articles that are not safe for work, so please use discretion!

This ad has been everywhere in the blogosphere lately. We open with an attractive, light-skinned Indian couple sitting on a couch, the man sipping his coffee and ignoring his wife, who looks despondent and lonely. Then, she jumps in the shower, uses her special wash for “fairness and freshness,” and when she returns it is all smiles and spinning in his arms in the living room. The gist of it is: your vagina must be fresh enough (and what does that even mean, really?) and also light enough in color in order to get approval and love. Colorism, particularly rampant in Indian society, really deserves its own post and I’m not well-equipped to discuss it in this one. Pam Spaulding wrote an article about the colorism in the ad and the damage skin whitening products can do at Pam’s House Blend. You can also read this excellent post on skin bleaching and colorism in India at Bitch Magazine. As for me, I’m fascinated by this commercial not only because of the colorism, but because its another entry in the long social trend of teaching women that their vaginas are incorrect in some way, and must be corrected in order to win the love of a man (and, therefore, by happy). The two big social forces at work here – shame over your anatomy and the need for male approval – are long-standing toxic messages that have been around for a while. Even the fact that douche is still on the market is an ever-present indicator of our culture’s issues with our vaginas – though I guess I’m somewhat grateful the advertising has become more about vague references to freshness and summer and less about getting your easily-disgusted-by-vaginas husband to love you again. Back in the ‘50s, Lysol was advertised as douche, with print advertisements almost identical to the ad above:

(Of course back in the day the same tactic was employed to sell everything, even coffee – If you’re into it, you can find more advice for women from that era in Lynn Peri’s excellent book Pink Think: Becoming a Woman in Many Uneasy Lessons.) To get back on track, the cultural pressure to have a perfect body has had a strong effect on how we feel about our vaginas and our vulva’s appearance, maybe because it’s an area of our bodies we don’t easily have a way to compare to others and see what’s normal. When we do see images of vulvas in our society, they usually have been Photoshopped to meet a particular image.

In fact, Australia has been in the news recently because its new Classification Guidelines disallow explicit depictions of the vulva, preferring them to be, to use a common pornographic magazine term, “healed to a single crease.” What they mean is, a vulva must not have visible labia, only a small crease may be visible. The phrase itself makes me crazy: healed!  As if an average vulva with labia is damaged or sick! I was willing to make the argument that Australia’s rule is simply prudish, that maybe they just find non-edited vulvas too graphic, until I learned that the same board also banned the appearance of 18+ but young-looking women with small breasts in adult publications, apparently due to concerns about these women encouraging pedophilia. Given that the growth of labia minora is a part of puberty, if they are so concerned with the maturity of their performers why would they insist on editing vulvas down to a more pre-pubescent, labia-free state? I’m not buying it. This is just another area where a Photo-shopped body has become the aesthetic norm, and women of Australia will have more opportunity to find their bodies as they are to be wrong, or unappealing.

So, say you look at porn or advertisements, and then look at your body and think, “Something’s wrong with me!” Don’t worry, there’s surgery for that. Labiaplasty is the practice of reducing the size of the labia minora so that they are smaller than the labia majora (diagram here for those uncertain exactly what I’m referring to). To be fair, some people may have labia minora long enough to cause discomfort, particularly while participating in sports or wearing tight fitting clothes for example, and for them this surgery may improve their quality of life. But there are also a lot of people who seek the surgery do so because they think something is wrong with the appearance of their vulvas as they are. A 2009 Guardian article talks to women and cosmetic surgeons and found that many “patients are not willing to accept that the physical appearance of their vulva is perfectly ordinary and healthy,” referring to their appearance as “hypertrophy” if the labia minora extend past the majora, although there is nothing pathologically wrong with them.

I personally am a supporter of body modification, and ultimately I support a person’s right to alter his/her body to reflect how they feel it should look. However, I also firmly believe that we don’t make choices in a vacuum and I think it’s worth examining what social forces are at work encouraging us to make some decisions over others, and whether we are harming ourselves by changing our bodies to fit a narrow cultural ideal. It’s clear that just like our stomachs, our skin and our noses, our vulvas are another area we are supposed to measure and compare against other (photo-edited) bodies. Ultimately, the problem here isn’t vaginal lightening creams or shortening our labia, it’s the pervasive cultural message that your vagina must meet some beauty standard (or men won’t love you).

So how do we fight back? The path to loving our bodies in all their variants is long and difficult for some of us. But if you’re curious to see if you’re normal, or want to see the wide variety of colors, sizes and shapes that vulva and labias come in, it may help to check out a body project like Vulva101. In their words: “Designed to help society overcome its fear and shame regarding vulva, Vulva 101 features close-up photos of one hundred and one women’s vulvas, ranging from 18 to 65 years old. Each page focuses on one woman’s vulva from three different angles. It also highlights the thoughts, feelings and experiences of the women involved, and the natural, unique beauty of the female form.” Projects like these are great for combating media images of the vulva as having only one appropriate form.

So, Feronia readers, what do you think? Would you get labiaplasty? Have you ever been worried a sexual partner would think your vulva looked wrong, or felt like your vulva looked wrong after comparing it to someone else’s? Let’s talk vulvas.

Small Penis Syndrome: An Epidemic?


Posted on March 15, 2012 by

Some people who have a penis feel they don’t meet “the standard” or are insecure about whether they ”measure up” to other penis owners. According to a study cited in Men’s Health magazine, BJU International found that 63% of men complained their penis did not meet the mark on the measuring stick, but none of them were smaller than normal. The numbers vary from study to study, but most penis size research findings have found their participants to be on average, between 4.5-5.5 inches when erect.

Many penis owners make a mistake by comparing their penises to others when they are flaccid (like in a locker room). This could definitely give someone a complex. Let’s clear something up. Many men who are small when flaccid grow a lot when erect (grow-ers). Those who are larger when flaccid grow less when erect (show-ers). Whether someone is a “show-er” or a “grow-er,” in the end it does not make a difference when it comes to satisfying a partner. Having a large penis does not make someone more masculine or “the man,” it just means they have larger male parts. When someone is into you, it’s not just for your genitals, it’s for the more important qualities (like your butt…just kidding).

But seriously, if someone makes you feel like you don’t meet their ideal body dimensions, you should find a new partner who thinks your body is irresistible. On the other hand, if you’re the one giving yourself a hard time then cut yourself some slack. Your male parts are perfect just the way they are so embrace them (literally or figuratively) and your partner will be drawn to your new self-confidence.