Tag Archives: pop culture

Feronia Gift Guide 2012


Posted on December 10, 2012 by

It’s that time again! The Feronia Gift Guide is back to help you with stressful holiday shopping. You can still peek at last year’s gift guide, but I’ve wrangled up a few more things you and your friends will love.

Ms. magazine put out a really good list of excellent non-fiction feminist books, from Bell Hooks to Ariel Chevy, that span issues of gender, race, class, and their intersectionality. You can’t go wrong with any of them really but especially check out Audre Lord, Susan Faludi, and bell hooks.

For some more, um, recreational reading you can check out Goodvibe’s list of sexy books. Show your 50 Shades of Grey-loving friends another take on erotica.

Support some rad lady artists and make your artsy friends happy. Gingko Press just put out a book of Tiffany Bozic prints.

Charmaine Olivia is another amazing artist. Her prints sell out fast but these sticker sets are beautiful and affordable.

The mommy-minded might appreciate these Nikki McClure Mama Baby prints. They’re both gorgeous and environmentally friendly; the paper is recycled and was created using wind and alternative power.

One condoms make excellent stocking stuffers. The designs on the packaging are so cool you (almost) won’t even want to use them (but you still should).

If you’re feeling feisty check out Babeland for a great selection of sex toys and erotica. Don’t forget to pick up something for yourself.

If you want to give a meaningful gift that helps others, hook up yourself or a friend with Women for Women, an organization that allows you to help finance business training and support for women survivors of war and conflict.

Have you guys stumbled upon something awesome this year you think we should know about? Post it in the comment section.

Media, Surgery, and Body Image: Loving Your Vulva Isn’t Easy Nowadays


Posted on May 21, 2012 by

Disclaimer: Most of the links in this article link to images or articles that are not safe for work, so please use discretion!

This ad has been everywhere in the blogosphere lately. We open with an attractive, light-skinned Indian couple sitting on a couch, the man sipping his coffee and ignoring his wife, who looks despondent and lonely. Then, she jumps in the shower, uses her special wash for “fairness and freshness,” and when she returns it is all smiles and spinning in his arms in the living room. The gist of it is: your vagina must be fresh enough (and what does that even mean, really?) and also light enough in color in order to get approval and love. Colorism, particularly rampant in Indian society, really deserves its own post and I’m not well-equipped to discuss it in this one. Pam Spaulding wrote an article about the colorism in the ad and the damage skin whitening products can do at Pam’s House Blend. You can also read this excellent post on skin bleaching and colorism in India at Bitch Magazine. As for me, I’m fascinated by this commercial not only because of the colorism, but because its another entry in the long social trend of teaching women that their vaginas are incorrect in some way, and must be corrected in order to win the love of a man (and, therefore, by happy). The two big social forces at work here – shame over your anatomy and the need for male approval – are long-standing toxic messages that have been around for a while. Even the fact that douche is still on the market is an ever-present indicator of our culture’s issues with our vaginas – though I guess I’m somewhat grateful the advertising has become more about vague references to freshness and summer and less about getting your easily-disgusted-by-vaginas husband to love you again. Back in the ‘50s, Lysol was advertised as douche, with print advertisements almost identical to the ad above:

(Of course back in the day the same tactic was employed to sell everything, even coffee – If you’re into it, you can find more advice for women from that era in Lynn Peri’s excellent book Pink Think: Becoming a Woman in Many Uneasy Lessons.) To get back on track, the cultural pressure to have a perfect body has had a strong effect on how we feel about our vaginas and our vulva’s appearance, maybe because it’s an area of our bodies we don’t easily have a way to compare to others and see what’s normal. When we do see images of vulvas in our society, they usually have been Photoshopped to meet a particular image.

In fact, Australia has been in the news recently because its new Classification Guidelines disallow explicit depictions of the vulva, preferring them to be, to use a common pornographic magazine term, “healed to a single crease.” What they mean is, a vulva must not have visible labia, only a small crease may be visible. The phrase itself makes me crazy: healed!  As if an average vulva with labia is damaged or sick! I was willing to make the argument that Australia’s rule is simply prudish, that maybe they just find non-edited vulvas too graphic, until I learned that the same board also banned the appearance of 18+ but young-looking women with small breasts in adult publications, apparently due to concerns about these women encouraging pedophilia. Given that the growth of labia minora is a part of puberty, if they are so concerned with the maturity of their performers why would they insist on editing vulvas down to a more pre-pubescent, labia-free state? I’m not buying it. This is just another area where a Photo-shopped body has become the aesthetic norm, and women of Australia will have more opportunity to find their bodies as they are to be wrong, or unappealing.

So, say you look at porn or advertisements, and then look at your body and think, “Something’s wrong with me!” Don’t worry, there’s surgery for that. Labiaplasty is the practice of reducing the size of the labia minora so that they are smaller than the labia majora (diagram here for those uncertain exactly what I’m referring to). To be fair, some people may have labia minora long enough to cause discomfort, particularly while participating in sports or wearing tight fitting clothes for example, and for them this surgery may improve their quality of life. But there are also a lot of people who seek the surgery do so because they think something is wrong with the appearance of their vulvas as they are. A 2009 Guardian article talks to women and cosmetic surgeons and found that many “patients are not willing to accept that the physical appearance of their vulva is perfectly ordinary and healthy,” referring to their appearance as “hypertrophy” if the labia minora extend past the majora, although there is nothing pathologically wrong with them.

I personally am a supporter of body modification, and ultimately I support a person’s right to alter his/her body to reflect how they feel it should look. However, I also firmly believe that we don’t make choices in a vacuum and I think it’s worth examining what social forces are at work encouraging us to make some decisions over others, and whether we are harming ourselves by changing our bodies to fit a narrow cultural ideal. It’s clear that just like our stomachs, our skin and our noses, our vulvas are another area we are supposed to measure and compare against other (photo-edited) bodies. Ultimately, the problem here isn’t vaginal lightening creams or shortening our labia, it’s the pervasive cultural message that your vagina must meet some beauty standard (or men won’t love you).

So how do we fight back? The path to loving our bodies in all their variants is long and difficult for some of us. But if you’re curious to see if you’re normal, or want to see the wide variety of colors, sizes and shapes that vulva and labias come in, it may help to check out a body project like Vulva101. In their words: “Designed to help society overcome its fear and shame regarding vulva, Vulva 101 features close-up photos of one hundred and one women’s vulvas, ranging from 18 to 65 years old. Each page focuses on one woman’s vulva from three different angles. It also highlights the thoughts, feelings and experiences of the women involved, and the natural, unique beauty of the female form.” Projects like these are great for combating media images of the vulva as having only one appropriate form.

So, Feronia readers, what do you think? Would you get labiaplasty? Have you ever been worried a sexual partner would think your vulva looked wrong, or felt like your vulva looked wrong after comparing it to someone else’s? Let’s talk vulvas.

Birth Control Pills: Then and Now


Posted on February 29, 2012 by

First Birth Control PillsCheck out this image of the first birth control pill. Strange, huh? Aside from the difference in dosage (5 mg – goodness!), what really blew my mind was the packaging. It never occurred to me before that the pill is one of the only medications I know of that comes packaged with careful such consideration to memory. In case you aren’t a pill user, the pills we use now generally look like this:

Helpfully labeled by date so we can remember if we took them or not.

According to this article on BC packaging at SocImages, back then “[w]omen were supposed to take 20 pills in a row, then none during their period. It was up to them to keep track of everything and remember when it was time to start taking the pills again.” Frankly, even with the carefully labeled packaging we use now, many women have a hard time remembering to take the pill on time (no judgment here, ladies, I’m a terrible pill taker myself. Nuva Ring for the win!)  I imagine there were many problems with taking it correctly, because it wasn’t long before an engineer created a pack that held exactly one month of pills, so that you knew when it was time to stop and have your period (Did you know that you don’t have to have a period on the pill? We’ll talk more about that another time). It came with a watch that had a calendar for your husband … I don’t know, it was the ‘60s. Finally, in 1965, we got day labels and placebo pills so we knew when to start a new pack.

Though it seems we’ve got the scheduling thing as nailed down as possible, birth control pill packs have still gotten more elaborate over the years (Alarms! Flowers!) Most of the fancy designs you can buy now seemed to be aimed at concealing the fact that you are carrying around birth control (sooo many make-up compact dupes!) or just looking as girly as possible – not bad things, of course, just interesting. The pill isn’t just another medication to many people – it’s a private matter you don’t want someone catching a glimpse of in your purse, or maybe something to dress up and celebrate.

If you want, you can see more cool images of old-school pill packaging here at PBS. And just for kicks, check out this timeline of contraceptive history at PBS.

The Problem with Pop Science


Posted on December 28, 2011 by

Science, despite its efforts to be objective, is easily influenced by social norms and expectations.  As science historian Londa Schiebinger points out in Salon, an excellent example of this is the human egg. Once thought to be a passive drifter awaiting a strong swimmer, it was determined in the 70′s to have microvilli on its surface to grab and catch sperm, becoming its own active force in fertilization.  The microvilli were actually discovered in the 1890′s, but not considered noteworthy until the 1970′s, as noted by Salon writer Margaret Wertheim in the same article, “a time when women’s roles in society were themselves being reconceived.”

I bring this up because pop science – what I consider the interpretation of scientific studies into soundbite worthy articles for news sites – is so often used to make headlines by using a study to present some (alleged) fact about men, women, and/or sex. These facts may conveniently be “politically incorrect,” which is the polite way of saying they reinforce conservative notions of gender or sex roles. Often, the culprit is my arch nemesis: Evolutionary Psychology (but more on that in another article).

Once you’ve noticed this trend, you’ll find it’s everywhere.  Just recently reported in August, a study done at FSU by Roy Baumeister found that “countries with greater gender equality have higher rates of sexual activity.”  According to his research, he found that “with [gender] parity comes a greater likelihood of casual sex and more sexual partners.”  Study number two, done by John Hopkins University and reported by the Huffington Post in September, finds that “dominant women have less sex.” The study was a survey of African women, and as co-author Carie Muntifering put it, “[u]nderstanding how women’s position in the household influences their sexual activity may be an essential piece in protecting the sexual rights of women and helping them achieve a sexual life that is both safe and pleasurable.”

I’m not interested in the fact that these two studies found such different results; they were done by different researchers with different subjects in different countries, after all.  What I find interesting is the conclusions drawn from the information as well as the reporting itself.  In study number one, the author uncovered higher rates of sexual activity. He went on to explain that “when women have more access to educational and financial opportunities, they don’t need to hold sex hostage as much, so they relaxed the controls they’ve put on sexuality.” He goes on to state that sex is used by women as an economic force to attain goals and “get what they want from men.”  The article describes the prevalence of increased casual sexual partners as a “mathematical, emotionless” characteristic.

In study number two, though the study author seemed to indicate that less sexual partners was a positive sign of increased sexual control for the African women, the writers of the article chose to frame it quite differently. They reported that “empowered women…could be losing out on sex” and that “the more decisions made, the less physical intimacy” they experienced, a decidedly negative-sounding side effect.  The important similarity between the two articles is this – both articles placed a negative connotation on women’s sexual freedom. The women who experienced increased sexual activity were mathematical and calculating, the women who experienced decreased sexual activity were missing out.  Looks like women can’t win!

Sometimes it’s not just the journalism you must look at with a skeptical eye, but the study itself.  The University of West Scotland did a study on the way women walk and their history of orgasms – particularly, vaginal orgasms.  16 subjects were analyzed for their gait and their history of orgasm. (I admit the article already lost me here – I’d never put much faith in a study with such a small sample size anyway.) They found that a “trained sexologist” could tell which women had vaginal orgasms based on the longer stride and increased vertebral rotation. They supposed that women who had vaginal orgasms may “feel more confident in their sexuality, which might be reflected in their gait.” They went on to discuss the studies implications for sexual dysfunction therapies. My issue with this? Lack of vaginal orgasm is not sexual dysfunction. The utter lack of discussion on the clitoral orgasm reinforces the long-standing cultural notion that vaginal orgasms are superior to clitoral ones and frankly seems a little insulting towards women who can only have the clitoral kind.

My point isn’t to judge anyone; they’re all looking for a human interest story, and all they have is their cultural mores and values to draw upon.  I just think it’s important to draw attention to how science, no matter how rigorous the method used, is vulnerable to our own cultural perceptions when we try to interpret it.  This has huge implications for what we consider true, as well as where we choose to get our information from. The next time you see a study in the news, pay careful attention to the dissonance between the data and the words used to describe it, and above all – stay skeptical.

Feronia Gift Guide: Cool Stuff For Cool People


Posted on December 12, 2011 by

It’s the time of year when we search to find the perfect gift for our friends and family that they don’t already have, isn’t crazy expensive and doesn’t suck…not an easy task. If you haven’t yet finished crossing off your list, don’t worry – I’ve got a bunch of great gift ideas, you lucky procrastinators.  I found a bunch of lady-friendly, fun and sex-positive gifts for you and your loved ones.

Book-lovers

For your friend who is a mom or is thinking about becoming one, I really enjoyed Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care, by Jennifer Block or try Firdaus’ recommendation, Misconceptions: Truth, Lies, and the Unexpected on the Journey to Motherhood, by Naomi Wolf. Both are insightful looks into the childbirth routine and the industry that surrounds it, from a perspective that is very supportive of mother’s rights and autonomy during birth.

The New Jim CrowFor your friend who likes sociological and racial analysis of our society (but really, don’t we all?), try The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, by Michelle Alexander, an award-winning book about the ongoing racial stratification in America.

For the fashionable and proud reader, Sarah Utter makes a cute “Reading is sexy” t-shirt.

Artsy types

If you know someone who’s always sketching or jotting down ideas, think about this gorgeous sketch pad by Olympia, Washington-based artist Nikki McClure.

Eco JournalFor the introspective or the aspiring writer, she also has this super pretty journal.

Also, you really can’t go wrong with Frida Kahlo socks. Sounds ridiculous, looks awesome. I own them in yellow.

The Silly

Herpes PlushFor your friend with a sense of humor, Giant Microbes make adorable plush versions of microbes. They have a wide variety, but I prefer their sexually transmitted infections.  Chlamydia is especially adorable. (Probably not a good gift for the germophobe.)

Help your friends show their feminist pride by wearing this Bra burning t-shirt. Yes, I know feminists never actually burned their bras but it’s still quite a statement.

Uterus underwearYou can wear your heart on your sleeve, but can you wear your uterus on your…uterus?  Yes, you can. You’re welcome.

The Granola

Fact: Vegetarians love cookbooks. These two are classics: The Moosewood Cookbook and Vegan With a Vengeance.

Or, you could always get her some cloth menstrual pads or a menstrual cup! She’ll look at you funny but thank you later.

The Sex-Positive

Pillpaks are a cute place to stash your birth control, with a handy alarm so you remember to take them.

Safe Sax bagSafe Sax make really cool tote bags, shoulder bags, or makeup bags lined with colorful condoms. For someone who likes to make a statement – be prepared for people to ask a lot of questions.

Our Bodies Ourselves, by the Boston Women’s Collective is a classic for any sex-positive/body-positive lady.  An excellent gift for a younger sister, especially.

Or, if you’re a really good friend, you could always buy something from Good Vibrations. Hey, get yourself something too.  It’s the season for giving, after all.

Target Women with Sarah Haskins


Posted on November 22, 2011 by

If you haven’t yet seen Target Women with Sarah Haskins, you’re in for a treat. Sarah and her team at Current TV explore the ridiculous, hilarious and often insulting content of pop culture/television advertisements in a collage of clips and clever critiques.

I stopped watching television about five years ago, and now it’s hard to even be around one while it’s on. To me, it’s not the television shows that get me nauseated, it’s the endless barrage of sexist/classist/racist commercials that are cleverly crafted to seep into your brain.

While I enjoy all of Sarah’s episodes, check out this knee-slapper on birth control:

Will this change the way you see advertisements too?