Tag Archives: presidential candidates

This Week In: Politics and My Increasing Frustration


Posted on March 6, 2012 by

No, I’m not actually an anarchist. And I’ll probably end up voting for Obama again, just to avoid having a president who will take away our birth control and make safe abortions illegal. But sometimes I look at our political system and the culture in which we must struggle for our rights and our health and just think … damn.

• So March is Women’s History Month and the Obama administration issued a Proclamation about it. I read through it, finding “promoting workplace flexibility, striving to bring more women into math and science professions, and fighting for equal pay for equal work,” OK; “combating violence against women,” OK;  “equal role in peace-building” OK … wait a minute. No mention of reproductive health? Birth control? Abortion? Any mention of the issues all over the headlines every day recently? At my most generous, that’s … an odd oversight. Cynical me thinks that this is a meaningless proclamation designed to be as inoffensive as possible to avoid any controversy (which, to Democrats, means making Republicans mad). Do women’s reproductive health choices only matter when the administration is trying to pass a healthcare bill? I hope not.  I was also bothered by this phrase: “While we have made great strides toward equality, we cannot rest until our mothers, sisters, and daughters assume their rightful place as full participants in a secure, prosperous, and just society.”  Um, this nation has many women citizens fully capable of working towards equality – why is that phrased like the country is full of dudes who just happen to be related to women? Perhaps it was phrased that way because most of his administration is made up of men…oh snap.

• So, not only were women not included in the Congress panel on contraception, but the one woman who was invited (by the Democrats, of course) was not allowed to speak because her name was allegedly submitted too late … sure. Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student, came to testify about the importance of birth control to women’s health and success. Even though she wasn’t even allowed to speak, she has still been subjected to media harassment. She’s been called a slut and a prostitute for admitting to needing birth control just like millions of American women. I’m not linking to a page because, frankly, I don’t want to give a certain someone more media attention, but Google if you must. But, in case you were under the impression that conservatives don’t think you’re a whore for being a sexual human being who uses contraception, sorry.

If you’d like to support Sandra Fluke, you can reach her on Twitter @sandrafluke. Have you guys been keeping up on the birth control stuff in the news? What are your thoughts?

This Week In: Your Government, the Good, the Bad, and the Huh?


Posted on January 31, 2012 by

Obama has denied requests from religious organizations hoping to withhold insurance coverage of contraception to their employees. Under the Affordable Health Care Act, birth control will be covered as preventive care (finally!), and some religiously-affiliated businesses argued that this violated their conscience. After Obama’s decision, although churches will be exempt from providing this coverage, employees of religious universities and hospitals will soon be able to get their birth control covered regardless of their employer’s beliefs. (Psst, church employees, Planned Parenthood still has affordable birth control if you need it!)

The Republican party had their debate in Florida Thursday night. You know, I tend to get a little lazy about following primaries because I often already have firm opinions about who I’m voting for, but I do think it’s important to know what the candidates are out there saying. When candidates speak, I try to remember that they aren’t necessarily saying what they believe, but what their advisors think voters want to hear, and that allows us a glimpse at the public’s fears and desires. This debate had the super-rich Romney and Gingrich defending their controversial financial investments while also asserting that being rich just means that you work hard, and arguments over health-care reform  where the focus of an attack on Romney’s Massachessets’ health care plan was that it too closely resembled Obama’s. There is a lot to unpack there, but I think my favorite part was Gingrich and Romney arguing over who is the most pro-immigrant; I was surprised to find that being too harsh on immigration was supposed to be a bad thing in the Republican party, although the old chestnut about immigrants stealing our jobs was trotted out, as usual. Did any of you watch the primary, and what did you think?

And, in your What-On-Earth news of the day, a Senator in Oklahoma has proposed a bill to ban the use of aborted human fetuses in products or food. Some questions immediately come to mind, such as: What? Why? Isn’t that…already illegal because of state infection control and biological material disposal regulations? (Yes, by the way). But it’s real. According to Senator Shortey who proposed the bill, its aim is actually to prevent use of stem cells in food products, which he states some companies have used to produce certain flavors. However, the actual language of the law states “no person or entity shall manufacture or knowingly sell food or any other product intended for human consumption which contains aborted human fetuses in the ingredients or which used aborted human fetuses in the research or development in any of the ingredients.” I’m not sure Senator Shortey is too clear on the concept of stem cell research and how it works, but I’m interested to see how the rest of the Oklahoma government responds to his proposal.

This Week In: Birth Control


Posted on November 3, 2011 by

● The world population has (possibly) reached 7 billion this week!

Salon considers how the passage of a Personhood amendment would affect the legality of birth control.  Mississippi votes next week on its so-called “personhood” amendment, and personhood supporters are working to get such an amendment put forward in every state.

● Personhood amendment supporter finally admits that if passed, some – if not all – birth control may become illegal.  An interesting admission, considering the vast majority of personhood amendment advertisements insist that contraception will not be outlawed.

Ron Paul comes out against President Obama’s health care plan that insists birth control be covered as preventive care under health insurance, stating that it “violates the conscience of millions of pro-life Americans,” and that furthermore he will “veto any bill with funding for Planned Parenthood or any other international family planning regimes.”  Yet another candidate falling in line with the anti-birth control, anti-health care talk.

The FDA is concerned about an increased risk of blood clots on birth control pills containing the hormone drospirenone.  They won’t make any official statement until Dec. 8th of this year, but it looks like it may be bad news for women who love their Yasmin, Yaz, or their generics.  Their concern does not extend to other birth control pills that don’t contain that hormone, but if you’re concerned about the risk of blood clots, you can update yourself on the symptoms to look out for here.

● And finally for some good news! The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is sponsoring the Future of Contraception Initiative and they are focusing on male birth control.  Some researchers “have found they are able to turn off sperm production in most, but not all, men” and they are also looking at “non-hormonal contraceptives that directly interfere with sperm production.”  This sounds like great news, but haven’t there been stories about male birth control coming onto the market for years now?  I’ll believe it when I see it.